Tinubu says 2023 ambition of some politicians is destroying APC like Coronavirus

Tinubu says the politicians 2023 ambition is not helping President Muhammadu Buhari's administration because they are too focused on the president's exit.

The National leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu has described the 2023 ambition of some top politicians in the APC as a sickness destroying the party like Coronavirus.

Tinubu said some individuals in their desperation for power orchestrated the suspension of the National Chairman of the APC, Adams Oshiomhole.

The former governor of Lagos said this in a statement on Sunday, March 15, 2020.

He said, “While coronavirus has been presently contained in Nigeria, we must be alert to another sickness that seems rampant within a certain segment of society. That sickness is old Ambition-virus 2023. This illness afflicts many in the political class along with their allies in the media.

The National Chairman of the APC, Adams Oshiomhole was recently suspended. (The Tide News Online)

“Those touched by this malady find that their ability to tell time and discern the difference between the present and the future has been strongly impaired. The carriers of this sickness are confused as to the very season our nation now finds itself.

“They conflate things, which no sensible person would conflate. The primary symptom of their malady is the driving tendency to believe the events of 2023 will be decided before we even exit the year 2020.”

Tinubu also said the politicians' ambition is not helping President Muhammadu Buhari's administration because instead of supporting the president, they are fixated on his exit.

He said, “In a broader context, those afflicted with the 2023 virus do a grave disservice to President Buhari and his administration. They should be trying their best to help the President. Instead of seeing President Buhari as our present leader and commander-in-chief, their sole contemplation is upon his eventual exit.

“Yet, not even a full year has passed since his second inaugural. How can they be committed to helping him realise his mandate when the fullness of their gaze is affixed to seizing this very mandate for themselves?”